0

3 approvals (The Quintessential Quintuplets, Kaguya-sama) :

  1. https://anime.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/70128
  2. https://anime.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/70129
  3. https://anime.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/69888

1 reject (Kaguya-sama) :

  1. https://anime.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/69887

Why?

It says

This edit copies a significant amount of content from an external source. Generic descriptions such as encyclopedia articles and ad copy do not provide useful guidance; try creating something useful to this community specifically, and be sure to attribute the original author. See: How to reference material written by others.

But how come that doesn't apply to the TQQ above?

3
  • All though I can't speak for the rejection, I approved the others because they did not seem to be a verbatim copy from wikipedia. However refer to: is copy pasting tag excerpts allowed? & Do not Copy wikipedia (or Others) into tags
    – Dimitri mx Mod
    May 20, 2022 at 6:20
  • 7
    Then that's my mistake, and they should have been rejected instead.
    – Dimitri mx Mod
    May 20, 2022 at 8:36
  • @Dimitrimx Wait I misspoke. I don't believe they were verbatim. See again. I made some changes like the '(2017-2020)'. For both kaguya-sama and TQQ I made edits.
    – BCLC
    Jul 12, 2022 at 23:31

1 Answer 1

7

I've rejected the other edits. As noted above in the comments do not copy verbatim.

1
  • Wait I misspoke. I don't believe they were verbatim. See again. I made some changes like the '(2017-2020)'. For both kaguya-sama and TQQ I made edits.
    – BCLC
    Jul 12, 2022 at 23:31

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .