over the past couple of days there have been a couple of edits by anonymous users on this answer on which character has died the most in the Dragonball Series. the edits attempt to remove the part
- Killed by Hit (Dragon Ball Super episode 71)
now on the 18th of December the above was an edit suggestion by an anonymous user which i rejected.
my reasoning for the reject was that the answer was made back in 2014, before Dragonball Super was a thing as such listing a death from Super deviates from the original intent of the post's owner.
Happy Face's edit was to change the "Dragon Ball Super:Universal Survival arc" part to just "Hit Arc" and move the episode number to the dot point.
twice already anonymous users have tired to remove this and boht times the removal has been rejected. however the second reject made on the 19th is what i want to highlight as one of our Mods, кяαzєя, used the same pre-fab reject reason i did originally in trying to reject the addtion in the first place
This edit deviates from the original intent of the post. Even edits that must make drastic changes should strive to preserve the goals of the post's owner.
So i am wondering, the edit i tried to reject that was later approved because it was "improved" (based on what i remember of the buttons available in the review que), should it have made in the first place? especially considering that the first edit was made when episode 71 had only just been aired in Japan and the anonymous users are citing episode 72 (which according to wikipedia hasn't even been aired yet)