As part of solidifying & simplifying our rules, let's look at tagging next.

The fact that our tagging is confusing has been brought up a few times in the past, and our current approach to creating new tags is somewhat case-by-case. For anyone unfamiliar with the site it's a little confusing why some tags get split and some don't. There have been multiple meta posts asking about it in different forms - so let's pin it down and decide solidly.

In this policy review, let's look at how we tag series that have multiple continuities. That is, series that have significantly different plots/stories and are essentially sub-series.

Some examples of this would be Fullmetal Alchemist and Fullmetal Alchemist: Brotherhood, The Evangelion TV Series / Evangelion Movies, and so on.

There are a couple of approaches we can take here and we'd like to hear what the A&M community wants to do.

3 Answers 3


I've appreciated SciFi and Fantasy SE's approach more and more as time goes on. For large franchises like Star Trek and Star Wars, SFF has a single tag for the franchise, and then tags for the specific properties in the franchise. For example, they have a tag, and then , , and so on. Questions about the franchise in general will be tagged with just the franchise tag. Questions about a specific series will have the franchise tag as well as the tag for the specific series.

So in our case, we would have an tag and then , , . Questions about the franchise as a whole, or which are open to answers drawn from any part of the franchise, can be tagged . Questions which are additionally focused on a single property would also have a specific tag. E.g. "Why was Asuka designed with red hair?" would be tagged because Asuka's character design pertains to the entire franchise and not just a specific series. "Why did Asuka say 'Kimochi warui'?" would be tagged ; this way it shows up in searches for questions, but it's also obvious that the question pertains to . This also solves the problem of specific tags that only have two or three questions; while there will be such tags (I don't know that we'll have many questions on , for instance), the questions will be double-tagged as , so all the Eva questions can be aggregated when necessary.

While I think this would solve our problem, it has two disadvantages. First, it's high maintenance. We would probably need high rep users to buzz around adding and subtracting tags to make sure that every question conforms to the convention.

Second, we'll have to make up our own names for cases like the 2003 Full Metal Alchemist anime, because the tag would need to be distinct from the main tag as well as the tag. I don't particularly like ʞɹɐzǝɹ's solution of adding dates and studios ( or ) as these shows are not commonly known by those titles, which means people will be even more likely to tag incorrectly and make more work for other users. I don't have a better idea, though.

  • 1
    Limiting it to big series seems better than applying it to everything, but where do we apply that cutoff? Commented Dec 19, 2015 at 9:35
  • 1
    @ToshinouKyouko Good point, SFF.SE has about ten or eleven franchises which are far and away bigger than anything else they have, so the choice of what to sub-tag was more obvious for them. Perhaps we could just take the lazily evaluated approach: make a series tag for everything, but when we see a question that has to specify which series or continuity it's talking about for the question to even be valid or sensible, go in and make a separate tag for that series. (And of course backfill the tags where this has already happened.)
    – Torisuda
    Commented Dec 19, 2015 at 18:04
  • 1
    I would also support judging on a case by case basis whether a work in a series is important and distinct enough to warrant a separate tag. The Dragon Ball Z movies mostly don't impact existing continuity in any way, so they don't really need their own tags. End of Eva hugely impacts existing continuity, so it warrants its own tag.
    – Torisuda
    Commented Dec 19, 2015 at 18:09
  • 1
    I support this approach. It's similar to how SO works with versioning issue (i.e. [java] vs [java-8]) since sometimes the question is specific to that version.
    – Aki Tanaka Mod
    Commented Jan 6, 2016 at 7:34
  • Alright, lets go with this approach officially! Let's roll it out over the next few days Commented Jan 7, 2016 at 10:18

I think the best approach is to Keep It Simple. We should use a single tag for these related series.

I realise the benefits of being able to look up FMA:B rather than FMA, but it gets very complicated quickly - when is something a continuity? do we tag all the Dragonball series and all their movies?

It also opens the floodgates for considering even more tags, consider , , and even . There may be questions about the series as a whole too. "Why are the titans attacking?" for example.

There aren't many questions for most series, the only ones that will benefit are the largest (FMA, is admittedly an example). Otherwise, we have 2 tags for maybe 3 questions (if even).

This also means an increase in the amount of retagging we need to do, the amount of tags we fall behind on season-by-season, etc.

I think having less tags, while less convenient for searchers is the more practical approach.

  • 4
    As you mentioned, consistency is the key. Where is the line drawn between the need of a different tag being created than one not being? Why do some series (Fate series, or Dragon Ball series) have separate tags while others (FMA series, Evangelion series) don't? Shouldn't there be a more consistent approach? Maybe a well defined criteria which makes it specific as to whether a particular tag should be created or not, rather than it being handled separately, or the participation of the whole community in deciding whether or not a tag should be created via a poll or something of the sort?
    – Ashishgup
    Commented Dec 10, 2015 at 21:29
  • 1
    I think this rule will force FMA: brotherhood watcher to know the old anime too. Which seems wrong as those two anime are non canon to each otehr and are different continuity. Related argument Why FMA and FMA brotherhood didn't have different tag? Commented Dec 15, 2015 at 13:09
  • 3
    @AnkitSharma I don't know if this'll really force FMA:B watchers to know FMA (2003), because most questions specify 2003 vs FMA:B vs manga. Also, where does the manga fall on the 2003 vs FMA:B divide, because it's name fits with the 2003 anime but the canon is with FMA:B?
    – kuwaly
    Commented Dec 15, 2015 at 17:58
  • @kuwaly specified in the middle of body? That means i have to read 20 question to sort out the 12 i really want to read? Commented Dec 15, 2015 at 18:02
  • 3
    @AnkitSharma Of the first 5 non-closed questions in the tag, 3 specify medium/series in the question or visible part of the text, and for the other 2 they're more generic so it doesn't matter, so it would take you just as long to tell from reading the question as telling what the question is would take you.
    – kuwaly
    Commented Dec 15, 2015 at 18:10
  • Fullmetall alchemist is a bit of a special case. I propose fullmetal-alchemist for the canon version (i.e. both Brotherhood and the manga) and fullmetal-alchemist-2003 for the anime. By like I said, FMA is a bit of a special case where the canon manga name is the same as a non-canon anime name. Commented Jan 6, 2016 at 18:57

I feel that we need a change. Our current policy on this makes things a bit vague and just seems lazy overall. I feel that the mods share some of the blame in their lack of action on the matter.

Because this has been brought up multiple times, it's about time we make an attempt to take action on the matter. Just putting it off til later merely delay the inevitable.

Why should I care?

First off, I personally think it makes for bad policy to have the tags be inconsistent. It feels a bit lazy to lump the whole of one series with different continuities under just the umbrella of one tag. Having multiple tags to differentiate a series will make it easier for both asker and answers as these questions will better establish the context of which series on is referring to. This will better confine the scope of the question to only that series, making most question easier to answer as you don't have to cover all the continuities if the OP doesn't specify.

Remakes and reboots fall under the same umbrella. Series like Hunter x Hunter and Ghost in the Shell often times change up the plot, alter scenes, and/or even add additional characters. Being able to make a distinction between the original from the remake can make answering one much easier, especially when you haven't seen one of them. This allows fans who are "experts" fans on one series to be able to seek out and cover the one that they are most familiar with.

What does this mean?

This doesn't mean every tag needs to be separated or be differentiated with an -anime, -manga, or -live-action suffix. It means we need to make a distinction between them. For example, by splitting into "fullmetal-alchemist-2003" and "fma-brotherhood" we can better focus on easy particular continuity and not have to specify which one we're talking about each time. It's the same logic as not needing to include the title series title in the question title when posting a question to reduce redundancy.

If a user asks about an event in a series with two different continuities (with a different outcome) and doesn't make a distinction as to which they are referring to, covering both might be require additional effort, especially if you've only seen one of them. It's a bit cumbersome to ask a Gundam Build Fighters specific question and need to differentiate it from the original Gundam or the Gunpla Builders Beginning G OVA, when all you have is the tag. A tag should refer specifically to a particular series rather than the franchise as a whole.

What we need is a clear set of guidelines to abide by. The an older series shouldn't be given precedence over a new one. If the titles are the same, we should add a date to both. If the difference between a manga and an anime is somewhat minor (no major divergences in the plot [e.g., the Angelic Layer anime vs manga and the Akame ga Kill anime vs manga, compared to the Shomin Sample anime vs manga]), there should be no need to separate the two (i.e., they'll fall under one tag).

Should there be exceptions?

There may be special circumstances to warrant separation. For an example, Dragonball, Dragonball Z, Dragonball GT, and Dragonball Super can be different enough to warrant separate tags while being all a part of one continuous series with shared characters, compared to Naruto and Naruto Shippuden, which should not. The Fate/Stay Night falls in a similar category, we should refer to the Deen TV anime as separate from the Deen UBW, which is separate from the ufotable remake of UBW and Heaven's Feel. Evangelion should be separated into the TV series, End of Evangelion movie, and the Rebuild movies. This way we can make a distinction and better focus on the topic specifically, rather than generalize them.

What should we do?

I propose that if we would like split series with different continuities establish an meta where we clarify everything from the guidelines of how to approach tagging to any exceptions to these guidelines, along with an explanation of why decide to do things this way. This would eliminate any confusion on the topic and set a precedence for future series as well.

Less isn't always practical, but consistency and clarity are. While it may require more work (for the mods and community; retagging question, synonymizing, making better tag excerpts and wikis, etc.) as a whole, I feel that starting to be more consistent with our current site policies can better shape our attitude and outlook on future policies as well.

  • 1
    "clear set of guidelines to abide by" - I don't mind this idea in concept, but I don't know if an easy set of guidelines is something that is actually feasible, due to so many individual cases Commented Dec 15, 2015 at 9:00
  • A clear set of guidelines will require some restructuring of the current system, it won't be an easy transition, but the infrastructure should be stand strong once we set everything in place. See chat for some elaboration: chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/26183638#26183638
    – кяαzєя Mod
    Commented Dec 15, 2015 at 9:04

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .